Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky News Weather Channel programming: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Whats new? (talk | contribs) +r |
tag |
||
Line 10:
*** I know that there are a whole load of other similar pages. Personally, I don't consider this to be a particularly useful argument in AfD discussions as per [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]] and would !vote delete for all of those as well. As you've stated, the problem is that they rapidly go out of date anyway, so are pretty useless even in their own terms. A list of TV programmes with no particular reason to suggest that they're notable is not encyclopedic in my opinion. [[WP: NOTTVGUIDE]]. [[User:JMWt|JMWt]] ([[User talk:JMWt|talk]]) 07:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
****Understand but respectfully disagree with you on other pages, however I do agree that in this particular case, this article should be deleted because it has NOT ONE citation, either on the article itself or through any wikilinks. '''-- [[User:Whats new?|Whats new?]]<sup>[[User talk:Whats new?|(talk)]]</sup>''' 07:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Grahamec|Grahame]] ([[User talk:Grahamec|talk]]) 01:29, 6 May 2016 (UTC)</small>
| |||