Talk:Coding best practices: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:46, 23 May 2016

Revision as of 16:01, 23 May 2016

Line 1:

==Old comment==

The article is full of sweeping generalizations, non-sequturs, and contoversial advice presented as fact.

It is amusing that it is accidentally correct in saying that the practices described have "incredible" (i.e not credible) value.

Line 78 ⟶ 80:

== Assertions ==

There is no discussion of the use of assertions. Assertions are a really useful tool to help debug programs. For example, at the JPL, one of their coding rules is that a certain percentage of the lines of code (I think about 8%) have to be assertions. It's easy to find a reference for that. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:280:4201:D47F:D45E:D915:C74:3BF2|2601:280:4201:D47F:D45E:D915:C74:3BF2]] ([[User talk:2601:280:4201:D47F:D45E:D915:C74:3BF2|talk]]) 17:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

{{Proposed deletion/dated

|concern = Collection of the outside links, but it is ''way'' better covered at [[Computer_programming#Modern_programming]]. See also [[Software quality]] and [[Software development process]] [[User:Ushkin N|Ushkin N]] ([[User talk:Ushkin N|talk]]) 07:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

|timestamp = 20160523074634

|help =

}}