Memory confusion protocol: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:30, 15 June 2013

Revision as of 14:57, 3 June 2016

Line 4:

#Subjects are not forewarned of the final step, a surprise [[Recollection|recall]] task: the sentences are presented in random order, and the subjects must attribute each to the correct individual.

The subjects' mistakes in the recall task reveal how they categorize the individuals: the subjects are more likely to misattribute A's statement to B if they grouped A and B as members of the same category than if they considered them members of different categories.<ref>{{ cite journal | author=Taylor, S., Fiske, S., Etcoff, N., & Ruderman, A. | date=1978 | title=Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping | journal=Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | volume=36 | issue=7 | pages=778–793 | doi=10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.778}} A description and example are given at {{ cite journal | title=Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization | authorauthor1=Robert Kurzban , |author2=John Tooby, and |author3=Leda Cosmides |last-author-amp=yes | journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | date=December 18, 2001 | volume=98 | issue=26 | pages=15387–15392 | url=http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/papers/eraserace.pdf | accessdate=2008-06-11 | doi=10.1073/pnas.251541498 | pmid=11742078 | pmc=65039}}</ref>

==References==