Generating set of a module: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 3:
Explicitly, if ''G'' is a generating set of a module ''M'', then every element of ''M'' is a (finite) ''R''-linear combination of some elements of ''G''; i.e., for each ''x'' in ''M'', there are ''r''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''r''<sub>m</sub> in ''R'' and ''g''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''g''<sub>m</sub> in ''G'' such that
:<math>x = r_1 g_1 + \dots + r_m g_m</math>.
Put in another way, there is a surjection
:<math>\oplus_{g \in G} R \to M</math>.
(Coincidentally, since a generating set always exists, this shows that a module is a quotient of a free module, a very useful fact.)
 
A generating set of a module is said to be '''minimal''' if no proper subset of the set generares the module. If ''R'' is a [[field (mathematics)|field]], then it is the same thing as a [[basis (linear algebra)|basis]]. Unless the module is [[finitely-generated module|finitely-generated]], there may exist no minimal generating set.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mathoverflow.net/questions/33540/existence-of-a-minimal-generating-set-of-a-module|title=ac.commutative algebra - Existence of a minimal generating set of a module - MathOverflow|work=mathoverflow.net}}</ref>