Revision as of 14:26, 7 June 2016 edit Hammersoft (talk \| contribs) Administrators 94,528 edits →Oppose Vote ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:34, 8 June 2016 edit undo Timotheus Canens (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 38,586 edits →Oppose Vote: o Next edit →
Line 234: #'''Oppose''' Continuing on the blacklist is justified for now given the concerns.[[User:Pincrete\|Pincrete]] ([[User talk:Pincrete\|talk]]) 20:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' We are to allow a site known for malicious activities to spread their links onto this project? The supporters need to take a long hard look in the mirror and decide if they want Wikipedia to be overrun with commercialism. Archive.is needs to be a hell of a lot more forthcoming with the Foundation before we could dream of allowing this. As is, it's nightmare waiting to happen. Allowing archive.is to run amok of this project is no better than welcoming Willy on Wheels back with open arms. --[[User:Hammersoft\|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft\|talk]]) 14:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. This is the proverbial drinking poison to quench thirst. And we are not that thirsty anyway. [[User:Timotheus Canens\|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens\|talk]]) 02:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC) <!-- END OF VOTING SECTIONS SIGN YOUR VOTE! ~~~~

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Archive.is RFC 4: Difference between revisions