Talk:Opcode: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:20, 30 May 2016

Revision as of 11:03, 28 June 2016

Line 1:

{{Talk header}}

{{WikiProject Computer science|class=Start|importance=High}}

== Unnamed section ==

==Title==

could some one change the title from "Opcode" to Op-Codes/Op-code please

Line 10 ⟶ 11:

even with one bit you would have two op-codes 0/1 ;p

thank.........

<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.106.6.150|71.106.6.150]] ([[User talk:71.106.6.150|talk]]) 2005-04-27T23:00:46‎</small>

--(unsigned) 2005-04-27T23:00:46‎ IP 71.106.6.150

: Um, no, because the proper abbreviation is "opcode". Btw, this article is horrible at this point. One might suggest looking at the format of other wiki articles to start with.

: <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.223.123.9|64.223.123.9]] ([[User talk:64.223.123.9|talk]]) 2005-06-21T02:50:13‎</small>

: --(unsigned) 2005-06-21T02:50:13‎ IP 64.223.123.9

::¨As an example let's design a crude 4-bit microprocessor¨

Line 37 ⟶ 38:

It is being mentioned (and explained a bit) here: [http://webmaster.iu.edu/perl56/pod/perlunicode.html#important%20caveat Perl Unicode caveat].

<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/213.84.10.118|213.84.10.118]] ([[User talk:213.84.10.118|talk]]) 2006-06-28T11:25:40‎</small>

--(unsigned) 2006-06-28T11:25:40‎ IP 213.84.10.118