Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BU Rob13: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:55, 8 July 2016

Revision as of 06:20, 8 July 2016

Line 303:

#'''Support''' - A courteous and helpful editor. Based on their answer to Q5, I am going to trust Rob to be careful when applying extended confirm protection. [[User:Altamel|Altamel]] ([[User talk:Altamel|talk]]) 02:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

#'''Support'''. I have considered the various oppose rationales. ''(a) Too many automated edits?'' There has been a lot of good non-automated work too, which has demonstrated the candidate's knowledge and ability. ''(b) Not here long enough?'' A year is more than enough to figure out how this place works. ''(c) The Catherine Zeta-Jones incident?'' His engagement in the infobox discussion looks fine to me. He engaged with other editors; there's no evidence of "not appreciating other opinions". ''(d) discussion about deletion nominations:'' His comments seem to have been misconstrued, as mentioned below. In any event, that was during his first week here. ''(e) a returning editor?'' I accept the explanation about how he came to be here. ''(f) the involved close?'' he identified himself as involved and invited people to overturn if necessary. Did anyone? ''(g) empty list AFD:'' storm in a teacup. ''(h) Question 21 answer:'' the candidate has further explained, and I think the explanation is sound.

:#:These oppose rationales, taken either individually or as a whole, have not convinced me I should oppose too. I see a level head, plenty of good work and reasonable judgment displayed by the candidate. So he gets my nod. [[User:Athomeinkobe|AtHomeIn神戸]] ([[User talk:Athomeinkobe|talk]]) 02:37, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

#'''Support''' per Athomeinkobe. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&amp;</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 05:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)