Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BU Rob13: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Support: Moving to neutral |
|||
Line 378:
#'''Neutral''' moved from support. After all my years here I still don't understand the ins and outs of CU. But Question 21 has finally planted seeds of uncertainty in my mind. If you're relatively new to something like Checkuser, you would think that you'd listen a bit more to the opinions of editors that have a great deal more experience than you. Of all the questions, it is 21, its response and the response of the experienced editor who'd raised it, at Oppose 20, that does now leave me unsure. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 04:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
#Only neutral per Montana, essentially, but I'd also like to target the frequent oppose reason of "not enough experience." Look, a year is 12 months or 365 days or 8760 hours. People can get a handle on our policies and norms within that time—not everyone, certainly, but a auto-oppose because "hasn't met my precise time requirement of exactly x days" is ludicrous. Evaluate each case on its own merits. Not every account created in the last year is a returning sock. <small>Note: some people have done that above. Others have not.</small> [[User:The ed17|Ed]] <sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 20:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Neutral''' - I'm concerned by the various issues raised by SagaciousPhil, Bbb23, Godsy, and others. The issues aren't enough to make me oppose, but are enough to make me neutral. [[User:Banedon|Banedon]] ([[User talk:Banedon|talk]]) 09:37, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
=====General comments=====
| |||