Revision as of 09:37, 8 July 2016 edit Banedon (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 17,055 edits →Neutral ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:40, 8 July 2016 edit undo BethNaught (talk \| contribs) Administrators 33,012 edits →Oppose: o Next edit →
Line 360: #'''Oppose''' - Approximately [https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=BU+Rob13&project=en.wikipedia.org 10 months of active editing on Wikipedia] is a little on the light side for adminship IMO, and the above answers and related issues over questions 19 (RfCs) & 21 (CheckUser) concern me. [[User:Guy1890\|Guy1890]] ([[User talk:Guy1890\|talk]]) 04:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. If the candidate is really interested in adminship, I'd suggest they come back in about six months after a bit more community scrutiny. I can't entrust the mop to someone whose character hasn't yet been adequately revealed through action. [[User:BusterD\|BusterD]] ([[User talk:BusterD\|talk]]) 13:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. I'm troubled by the CU incident. [[User:BethNaught\|BethNaught]] ([[User talk:BethNaught\|talk]]) 10:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC) =====Neutral=====

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BU Rob13: Difference between revisions