Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BU Rob13: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
BethNaught (talk | contribs) →Oppose: o |
→Oppose: re Jenks24 |
||
Line 358:
#At a modern RFA, I would expect at least a year of experience, so we know how the candidate will react in contentious situations. The FAC incident doesn't reassure me either. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 02:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
#:I normally have a great deal of respect for your opinion, {{u|Rschen7754}}, but don't you think this is at least a little hypocritical, considering you went for (and passed) RfA with less than a year of experience? [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 08:44, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
#::To be fair, Rschen7754's [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rschen7754|RfA]] was over ten years ago, when the expectations were far different than they are today. A great number of admins, myself included, would not make it if our passing RfAs were run today. —[[User:DoRD|DoRD]] ([[User talk:DoRD|talk]]) 12:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - Approximately [https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=BU+Rob13&project=en.wikipedia.org 10 months of active editing on Wikipedia] is a little on the light side for adminship IMO, and the above answers and related issues over questions 19 (RfCs) & 21 (CheckUser) concern me. [[User:Guy1890|Guy1890]] ([[User talk:Guy1890|talk]]) 04:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. If the candidate is really interested in adminship, I'd suggest they come back in about six months after a bit more community scrutiny. I can't entrust the mop to someone whose character hasn't yet been adequately revealed through action. [[User:BusterD|BusterD]] ([[User talk:BusterD|talk]]) 13:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
| |||