Revision as of 15:52, 8 July 2016 edit Sir Joseph (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 20,136 edits →Questions for the candidate ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:53, 8 July 2016 edit undo Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 (talk \| contribs) 90,395 edits →Questions for the candidate: noting previous version of question Next edit →
Line 135: :'''24.'''What is your opinion on No Legal Threats and how would you react/action/block when a threat or perceived threat is made? ::'''A:''' (This question was changed after I answered it. Please see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FBU_Rob13&type=revision&diff=728920137&oldid=728919670 here] for the original question.) No, absolutely not. They're commenting on the possibility that Wikipedia could be subject to a lawsuit from another person, not threatening to file one. As per [[WP:NLT]], "A discussion as to whether material is libelous is not a legal threat." We'd pretty much have to block every participant of an [[WP:FFD]] if we blocked editors for discussing how certain content may create legal issues for the Foundation. ====Discussion====

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BU Rob13: Difference between revisions