Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BU Rob13: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
add |
|||
Line 380:
#'''Oppose''' Per Softlavender, MSJapan, and Hobit. [[User:Kiwifist|Kiwifist]] ([[User talk:Kiwifist|talk]]) 22:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. I have been seeing the concerns about experience and maturity, and had been planning to give the candidate a pass. However, I just saw a very ill-considered comment directed at me at the current RfB, so I am moving from support to oppose. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 00:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - This will likely pass, and length of time and automated editing concerns don't concern me in this case - his work at CfD appears exemplary - but I find I agree with [[User:Tryptofish]] on 2 counts, one, that that comment (setting aside using the term "vote") didn't seem to [[WP:AGF|presume the good faith]] xaosflux seemed to give Tryptofish's perspective, but also the concerns about "tone", and examples of interaction with others, noted above. This falls to "is responsible" and "is civil/agf/eq" in my [[User:Jc37/RfA/Criteria|criteria]]. Perhaps with more experience? Time will tell, I suppose.- <b>[[User:Jc37|jc37]]</b> 00:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
=====Neutral=====
| |||