Talk:Universal Windows Platform apps: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:48, 10 July 2016

Revision as of 18:07, 10 July 2016

Line 217:

:::Paraphrasing isn't a terrible mistake. It's exactly what we're supposed to do. I don't know if you're right that that is what Windows 10 says because you haven't provided a source. [[User:Permstrump|<font color="indigo">—'''PermStrump'''</font>]][[User Talk:Permstrump|<font color="steelblue">(<u>talk</u>)</font>]] 15:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

:::::{{Ping|Permstrump}} Look my friend, I understand that the most difficult thing in Wikipedia is telling someone that he or she is wrong. Because that's when the ability to assume good faith is stress-tested. But trust me: You did intend to paraphrase but ended up creating an amalgamation of something that is neither here nor there. Now, please, look at what you wrote again.

::::You weren't paraphrasing. That's the terrible mistake.

::::Yeah,Another I did. Windows 10 itself.matter: Books, films, articles, and software are often used as sources for themselves in Wikipedia, for trivial stuff like their names, names of chapters, etc. Additionally, the plot of books, films and video games can come from the work itself. And articles on Windows components use the Windows itself as the source for the title. WhyThat's notwhat the namearticle twodoes: typesWrites three names that are seen in Windows 10. The source is therefore Windows 10. I know, that it is definitely [[WP:PRIMARY|a primary source]] but the triviality of appsquotation now?makes the source suitable.

:::::Best regards,

:::::[[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 1518:4807, 10 July 2016 (UTC)