Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperialist competitive algorithm: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
The reasons ICA article should be on the Wikipedis |
m Signing comment by 209.203.71.82 - "The reasons ICA article should be on the Wikipedis" |
||
Line 43:
If we ignore using criteria and just use poetic words and phrases as labels then we are not having a scientific decision, it is indeed a personal decision on behalf of a whole community. The criteria must be so clear and precise that even we apply it to famous algorithms like Genetic Algorithms and Ant Colony Optimization and treat them using the same conditions we have for the others. Because, science is the area of criteria-based reasoning, not making a decision based on examples and without reaching a criterion. If there is any simple, clear and precise definition that classifies the work of about 3,000 researchers as "metaphor-inspired metaheuristic cruft", we should first state it, justify it and then use it to claim that an algorithm is cruft, referencing criterion number X. To separate a good and bad scientific work, the method and reasoning should be scientific itself. We can not help science by approaching it with a non-scientific labeling and without having well-defined criteria.
So if there is any criterion that classifies ICA in "metaphor-inspired metaheuristic cruft" we should have it first, before making any decision. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/209.203.71.82|209.203.71.82]] ([[User talk:209.203.71.82|talk]]) 03:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
| |||