Revision as of 13:56, 29 July 2016 edit Anarchyte (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators 42,006 edits Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firefly algorithm closed as keep ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:21, 29 July 2016 edit undo Diego Moya (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 29,477 edits →/: new section / new section Next edit →
Line 17: I do not think the article is biased, though some of the papers may indicate the algorithm can be superior in their applications. So it's all up to the interpretation of the results. I have working in this area for many years, and I have rewrote that sentence to weaken the claims by that article. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ουδέτερος\|Ουδέτερος]] ([[User talk:Ουδέτερος\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ουδέτερος\|contribs]]) 11:29, 7 December 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == /* */ new section == == Deleted content == A large amount of content and references was removed with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Firefly_algorithm&type=revision&diff=730193175&oldid=730106228 this series of edits]. [[User:Diego Moya\|Diego]] ([[User talk:Diego Moya\|talk]]) 20:21, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Firefly algorithm: Difference between revisions