Rod and frame test: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:05, 16 August 2014

Revision as of 03:55, 30 July 2016

Line 4:

[[File:Rod and Frame Apparatus.png|thumb|Picture 1. A picture taken of the Rod and Frame apparatus originally sold by the Stoelting company, and now owned by the Rochester Institute of Technology.]]

The rod and frame illusion occurs because of the effect of the orientation of the frame on the rod. In the simplest example of the rod and frame illusion, the illusion will cause the participant to perceive the rod to be oriented congruent with the orientation of the frame.<ref name=Corbett>Corbett and Ennis, 2006</ref> When the participant is viewing the rod and frame that are both positioned at 0 degrees (or vertical), he or she perceives the rod as vertical with perfect accuracy. However, when the frame is tilted away from vertical the participant’s perception of vertical is affected. The participant tends to perceive the rod to be tilted in the same direction as the frame is oriented (e.g. if the frame is tilted in the counterclockwise direction the rod will also be perceived as being tilted counterclockwise). As the tilt of the frame increases, the participants’ perceived vertical increasingly deviates from true vertical.

==Rod and Frame Test==

To perform the rod and frame task, an apparatus consisting of a rod in a square frame is used. An example commercial apparatus can be seen in picture 1. When the participant is being tested using the apparatus, their head is fastened firmly in the chin rest to prevent the participant from collecting visual cues from outside of the apparatus. The rod and frame are shown in the center of the far end of the apparatus, which provides a [[frame of reference]] to the participant. Both the participant and the experimenter are able to adjust the orientation of the rod, while only the experimenter can adjust the frame orientation by using the appropriate knobs on the apparatus, as seen in picture 2. The experimenter is able to see the exact degree measurement of the rod and frame from vertical, while the participant sees the physical rod and frame inside the apparatus.

The methods of constant stimuli, limits, and adjustment can be used to test the participants, but method of limits is most commonly used in research conducted using the rod and frame task.<ref name=Wenderoth>Wenderoth, 1977</ref> When using the method of limits the experimenter sets the orientation of the rod and frame separately and then the participant is asked to adjust the rod orientation until they perceive it to be vertical. Deviation from true vertical can then be determined. Based on which way the frame is tilted, the rod can be viewed as either being tilted in the same direction as the frame (direct effect), or in the opposite direction of the frame (indirect effect).

==Evidence==

[[File:Example of Perceived Vertical.jpg|thumb|Picture 2. An image showing a 10 degree frame angle and a 7 degree rod angle. Observers using the apparatus see the rod as vertically oriented. The frame of the page, image border etc. make it appear tilted here.]]

Line 12 ⟶ 14:

In 2010, Lipshits found that along with this hierarchy of processing, that proprioceptive information, as opposed to gravity, is used by the body to determine which way is vertical.<ref name=Lipshits>Lipshits, 2010</ref> The researcher mentions that when we are not able to use vision to determine which way is vertical, people use other cues based on the axis of their head and body.

==See Alsoalso==

* [[Frame of reference]]

* [[Visual perception]]

Line 24 ⟶ 26:

* {{Cite journal | last1 = Corbett | first1 = J. | last2 = Enns | first2 = J. | year = 2006 | title = Observer pitch and roll influence: The rod and frame illusion | url = | journal = Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | volume = 13 | issue = 1 | pages = 160–165 | doi = 10.3758/bf03193828}}

* {{Cite journal | last1 = Spinelli | first1 = D. | last2 = Antonucci | first2 = G. | last3 = Daini | first3 = R. | last4 = Zoccolotti | first4 = P. | year = 1995 | title = Local and global visual mechanisms underlying individual differences in the rod-and-frame illusion | url = | journal = Perception & Psychophysics | volume = 57 | issue = 6 | pages = 915–920 | doi = 10.3758/bf03206806}}

* {{Cite journal | last1 = Wenderoth | first1 = P. | year = 1977 | title = An analysis of the rod-and-frame illusion and its variants | journal = Studies in Perception | volume = | issue = | pages = 95-14195–141 | doi = }}

* {{Cite journal | last1 = Lipshits | first1 = M. | last2 = Bengoetxea | first2 = A. | last3 = Cheron | first3 = G. | last4 = McIntyre | first4 = J. | year = 2005 | title = Two reference frames for visual perception in two gravity conditions | url = | journal = Perception | volume = 34 | issue = | pages = 545–555 | doi = 10.1068/p5358}}