Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 16:
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
*'''Merge''' to [[Swarm intelligence]]. It seems like there is a bit of secondary citation/usage of the algorithm, but that doesn't seem to indicate standalone notability because the publications are only mentioning the algorithm rather than giving in-depth secondary coverage. For a potential merge, someone would need to look over the sources to find what they consider a decent secondary source summarizing the method such as from the lede, [[tq|This algorithm contains a few essential elements of natural water drops and actions and reactions that occur between river's bed and the water drops that flow within.]] That itself may not be notable or need to be rewritten over at [[swarm intelligence]] too though. All the rest wouldn't be worth merging much less a standalone article per [[WP:NOTMANUAL]] and [[WP:NOTJOURNAL]]. [[User:Kingofaces43|Kingofaces43]] ([[User talk:Kingofaces43|talk]]) 05:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The nomination talks of "few references" when the page when nominated actually had 22 separate references and most of them used the subject title. I have made an independent source search and had no difficulty finding a [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-9wlBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA48 respectable book source] from the many choices available. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 10:42, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
| |||