Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 71.66.101.171 - ""
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java/Archive 3) (bot
Line 85:
:Err... Java is an open standard. [[Special:Contributions/68.173.113.106|68.173.113.106]] ([[User talk:68.173.113.106|talk]]) 21:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC) (woops, sorry! I thought it was but the oracle google lawsuit made me wonder.
::I agree there really is no point to having articles like this at all. This is something that makes sense for a Gartner or Forrester report but not an encyclopedia. [[User:MadScientistX11|MadScientistX11]] ([[User talk:MadScientistX11|talk]]) 21:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 
== Language history and evolution -outright bias ==
 
This section is terrible, and terribly unencylopedic. Java comes off as the George Orwell "Animal Farm" of computing, while C# sounds like the tyrant with operational efficiency. I think framing the historical perspective is very important, but it comes off so biased I think deleting it entirely would add to the article. An alternative would be to cut any post-2000 (the debut of C#) reference from the article. Would anyone be opposed to this? [[User:Evolvedmicrobe|Evolvedmicrobe]] ([[User talk:Evolvedmicrobe|talk]]) 04:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 
:I'm a little tired of seeing accusations of 'bias' here; as far as I can see, the Java section is just sloppy, and the claims made there can be substantiated with references or deleted. However it would be good to avoid creating complete version histories of both and refer to [[Java version history]], [[Java (software_platform)#History]], [[C Sharp (programming_language)#History]], and [[.NET Framework version history]] for details instead. [[User:Rp|Rp]] ([[User talk:Rp|talk]]) 10:16, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 
Agreed! [[Special:Contributions/132.183.101.106|132.183.101.106]] ([[User talk:132.183.101.106|talk]]) 22:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 
Agree, the section is removed. -- [[User:Softzen|Softzen]] ([[User talk:Softzen|talk]]) 04:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 
== Section Language history and evoluton deleted ==
 
The previous issue list by other editors:
 
{{Original research | date=December 2007}}
{{Weasel | date=March 2011}}
{{relevance | date=March 2011}}
 
The section has been removed, because much of its information is subjective, superfluous, and duplicated elsewhere, e.g. in the C Sharp and Java main articles. -- [[User:Softzen|Softzen]] ([[User talk:Softzen|talk]]) 03:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 
== External links modified ==