Open Contracting Data Standard: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m top: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes using AWB (12041)
m adding a reference to an article explaining how the implementation of OCDS will reduce costs.
Line 5:
Adoption of the standard requires publishers to release data under an open license.<ref>http://standard.open-contracting.org/latest/en/implementation/licensing/?highlight=license</ref> Publishers are encouraged to use a scale of publishing complexity, from basic which features just tender notices, to advanced and extended data, which features contract award notices, contract details and persistent URIs.<ref>http://standard.open-contracting.org/latest/en/implementation/levels/</ref>
 
Open Contracting claim that the use of the standard will reduce costs<ref>https://openopps.com/blog/post/21/why-good-procurement-data-does-more-than-fight-corruption/</ref>, create more competitive contracting and prevent fraud and corruption.<ref>http://standard.open-contracting.org/latest/en/implementation/levels/</ref><ref>https://mediumopenopps.com/understanding-spendblog/post/11/why-the-open-contracting-data-standard-matters-2f5c6672ccbf#.j5v6qlyxs/</ref>
 
Pilot implementations are underway in the following countries: