Revision as of 13:46, 12 August 2016 edit Ian Makgill (talk \| contribs) 10 edits m adding a reference to an article explaining how the implementation of OCDS will reduce costs. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:02, 13 August 2016 edit undo Yobot (talk \| contribs) Bots 4,733,870 edits m →top: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes using AWB (12073) Next edit →
Line 5: Adoption of the standard requires publishers to release data under an open license.<ref>http://standard.open-contracting.org/latest/en/implementation/licensing/?highlight=license</ref> Publishers are encouraged to use a scale of publishing complexity, from basic which features just tender notices, to advanced and extended data, which features contract award notices, contract details and persistent URIs.<ref>http://standard.open-contracting.org/latest/en/implementation/levels/</ref> Open Contracting claim that the use of the standard will reduce costs,<ref>https://openopps.com/blog/post/21/why-good-procurement-data-does-more-than-fight-corruption/</ref>, create more competitive contracting and prevent fraud and corruption.<ref>http://standard.open-contracting.org/latest/en/implementation/levels/</ref><ref>https://openopps.com/blog/post/11/why-the-open-contracting-data-standard-matters/</ref> Pilot implementations are underway in the following countries:

Open Contracting Data Standard: Difference between revisions