Revision as of 03:19, 3 April 2016 edit Cyphase (talk \| contribs) 91 edits →Ridiculous: Responding to Dangnad's comments ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:29, 23 August 2016 edit undo 2001:bb8:2002:3400:5869:6820:f55d:fd67 (talk) →Why asymmetric?: new section Next edit →
Line 26: :** Being rude isn't going to help anything. :It would probably be better to make some suggestions for improvements, or make those improvements yourself. It would be awesome if you (or someone else) could write a Simple English article for this topic. [[User:Cyphase\|Cyphase]] ([[User talk:Cyphase\|talk]]) 03:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC) == Why asymmetric? == I don't see any reason why lattice-based crypto needs to be asymmetric. I'm not an expert on lattice-based crypto but I have least seen one symmetric cryptosystem and one commitment scheme based on lattices.

Talk:Lattice-based cryptography: Difference between revisions