Revision as of 08:29, 23 August 2016 edit 2001:bb8:2002:3400:5869:6820:f55d:fd67 (talk) →Why asymmetric?: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:29, 23 August 2016 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,868 edits m Signing comment by 2001:BB8:2002:3400:5869:6820:F55D:FD67 - "→Why asymmetric?: new section" Next edit →
Line 29: == Why asymmetric? == I don't see any reason why lattice-based crypto needs to be asymmetric. I'm not an expert on lattice-based crypto but I have least seen one symmetric cryptosystem and one commitment scheme based on lattices. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:BB8:2002:3400:5869:6820:F55D:FD67\|2001:BB8:2002:3400:5869:6820:F55D:FD67]] ([[User talk:2001:BB8:2002:3400:5869:6820:F55D:FD67\|talk]]) 08:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Talk:Lattice-based cryptography: Difference between revisions