Revision as of 22:03, 11 January 2015 edit Ahunt (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 229,521 edits →This huge article needs to be pruned. In particular, the reception section.: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:38, 28 August 2016 edit undo Sandstein (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 191,071 edits →Size of the "controversy" section: new section Next edit →
Line 48: Isn't unity rather a [[graphical shell]] then a user interface? <span style="text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em black">[[User:ScotXW]]</span><sup>[[User talk:ScotXW\|t@lk]]</sup> 16:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC) == Size of the "controversy" section == I think the "controversy" section could easily be pruned to a more manageable size, rather than consisting of a chronological account of every twist and turn of the issue, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unity_(user_interface)&oldid=prev&diff=736602332 others disagree]. Per [[WP:WEIGHT]], individual controversies shouldn't dominate the article. Opinions? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein\|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 16:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Unity (user interface): Difference between revisions