Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Updating nomination page with notices and new AFDC cat (assisted) |
d |
||
Line 6:
Article de-prodded by creator on claims of Novelty and usefulness. Article does not appear to be about a topic with significant external coverage, suggesting it does not meet minimum notability requirements. [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 12:07, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Mathematics|list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 14:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''', [[WP:TOOSOON]]. Based on a single recent publication that Google scholar lists as having only three citations; actually what it has is two self-citations and something that was published earlier and listed erroneously, so there are no independent references, even ones as minimal as a brief citation. Fails [[WP:NOR]], [[WP:GNG]], and probably [[WP:REFSPAM]]. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 20:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
| |||