Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sparse representation of a number: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was delete |
Hazard-Bot (talk | contribs) m Bot: Removing closed AfD from Category:AfD debates relisted 3 or more times |
||
Line 20:
*I'm not going to vote. I think I can find more sources, but not after the end of the summer holiday, when I'll be back in my university. Since it's going to take at least a month, and that I understand very-well that there is no easy way right now to assess notability, I understand that it will be deleted. But, no original research, even if I clearly see that there is no way to distinguish OR from non-OR without sources. Even if it is not merged to [[Skew binary number system]], if (when) this page is deleted, the Skew page will need to be edited in order to explain how sparseness can be used on numbers presetend in a Skew binary system. [[User:Arthur MILCHIOR|Arthur MILCHIOR]] ([[User talk:Arthur MILCHIOR|talk]]) 06:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —[[User:UY Scuti|<font color="CornflowerBlue" face="Times">'''UY Scuti'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:UY Scuti|<font color="Green" face= "Times">Talk</font>]]</sup> 19:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' Final relist. Seeing as sources may be forthcoming in the future, might as well do this. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 07:43, 31 August 2016 (UTC)<br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 07:43, 31 August 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --
*'''Well'''... there's two refs. The one I can read uses "Sparse representation" and describes it and its benefits (some). So it's not like the article creator just made this up. On the other hand, that's about all Google can find... JSTOR finds nothing... "Sparse representation" by itself mainly refers to other things, such as signal processing and stuff. As far as I can tell the authors of that one paper made up the term and its description. My ''guess'' is that they didn't, so '''keep''' the article is my gut feeling. Math is hard. I tagged it as being poorly referenced. [[User:Herostratus|Herostratus]] ([[User talk:Herostratus|talk]]) 18:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
| |||