Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 98.194.39.86 - "→Untitled: " |
|||
Line 12:
----
When one introduces terms such as "better" or "worse", that is injecting an opinion. And that, by definition, cannot be NPOV. Having used B (a little), C, C++, ... I can say that many of the statements in the article, and also within this "talk" section are simply false. The "history" about the ++ / -- operations are also untrue .. because those are clearly direct derivatives of the DEC PDP instruction set, or at the very least, were inspired by them. That's obvious to anyone who's ever written code for or even looked at an old PDP-7 (or later) programming manual. The PDP-7 was most certainly around when the B language was developed. There's too much wrong with this article to even know where to begin actually. I agree, in its current form it's practically useless for either a novice, or a computer engineer - since it contains so many errors and omissions. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.194.39.86|98.194.39.86]] ([[User talk:98.194.39.86#top|talk]]) 23:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
==A non-specialist’s complaint==
|