Revision as of 05:16, 7 September 2006 edit 70.100.2.24 (talk) →Automator ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:17, 7 September 2006 edit undo 70.100.2.24 (talk) →Automator Next edit →
Line 12: : I don't think that that particular definition of dimensionality has any bearing on Automator's admissibility; it's clearly a visual (as opposed to textual) medium. --[[User:Piet Delport\|Piet Delport]] 00:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC) :: As Automator is clearly a visual language, and it is questionable whether befunge is (I would argue no), I am changing the definition to the one I proposed, and adding Automator to the list.[[User:70.100.2.24\|70.100.2.24]] 05:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Visual programming language: Difference between revisions