Talk:Visual programming language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:17, 7 September 2006

Revision as of 05:19, 7 September 2006

Line 12:

: I don't think that that particular definition of dimensionality has any bearing on Automator's admissibility; it's clearly a visual (as opposed to textual) medium. --[[User:Piet Delport|Piet Delport]] 00:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

:: As Automator is clearly a visual language, and it is questionable whether befunge is (I would argue no), I am changing the definition to the one I proposed, and adding Automator to the list. [[User:70.100.2.24Harperska|70.100.2.24Harperska]] 05:1719, 7 September 2006 (UTC)