Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limeroad.com: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
K.e.coffman (talk | contribs) D |
K.e.coffman (talk | contribs) Delete with fire |
||
Line 16:
:The title seems misleading. It should be renamed to [[Limeroad]] or [[LimeRoad]] (The choice of capital R in between is deliberate here going by some articles and .com only suggests its an e-commerce website). Also the "Partnerships,"Online Traffic" and " Awards and Recognition" parts of the article are unsalvageable. It seems to be a stub after all these editing but the company seems to pass the notability test as per the verifiable sources. '''[[user:Vivek7de|<font color="blue">vivek7de</font>]]'''[[user talk:Vivek7de|<font color="green">--tAlK</font>]] 16:53, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:TNT]] -- unsalvageable even if the company is notable. Check out this contribution [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Limeroad.com&type=revision&diff=744117690&oldid=743579774 diff], which restored 3500 worth of promo content, while removing the AfD template. No point to keep this garbage in article history. No prejudice to recreation as [[LimeRoad]] if notability can be proven and better RS exist (which is not likely per the current state of things). But maybe the company will become more notable in the future, who knows? [[User:K.e.coffman|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman|talk]]) 05:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
| |||