Revision as of 19:19, 15 October 2016 edit CosmicAdventure (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 695 edits →Limeroad.com ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:27, 15 October 2016 edit undo David Gerard (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users 214,586 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 22: <small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein\|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 15:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Limeroad.com]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> '''Keep''' sanitized version. It may be doomed to be a stub forever, but there are no rules against that. --[[User:CosmicAdventure\|CosmicAdventure]] ([[User talk:CosmicAdventure\|talk]]) 19:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC) '''Delete''' sanitised version. It's a bit better, but I'm still unconvinced by the sourcing. (Also, why are we sourcing claims about an Indian company's activities in India to not merely an English paper, but an English tabloid.) - [[User:David Gerard\|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard\|talk]]) 19:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limeroad.com: Difference between revisions