Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limeroad.com: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Safehaven86 (talk | contribs) q. for Sandstein |
David Gerard (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 24:
*'''Delete''' sanitised version. It's a bit better, but I'm still unconvinced by the sourcing. (Also, why are we sourcing claims about an Indian company's activities in India to not merely an English paper, but an English tabloid.) - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 19:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
*{{yo|Sandstein}} did you mean for there to be a whole new discussion after the break, or is there a duplicate !vote above? [[User:Safehaven86|Safehaven86]] ([[User talk:Safehaven86|talk]]) 21:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
**It was specifically phrased as discussion of the sanitised version, so I proceeded discussing that in particular as should be reasonably clear from both Sandstein's actual words and mine - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 21:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
| |||