Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limeroad.com: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Steve Quinn (talk | contribs) →Limeroad.com: copy edit my delete Ivote |
→Limeroad.com: adding comment |
||
Line 32:
*'''Comment''' -- the "sanitised version" is equally unconvincing. [[User:K.e.coffman|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman|talk]]) 06:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' to be sanitized or not to be, that is the question: whether 'tis nobler to accept one version over the other; to suffer the slings and arrows of sources that are only PR, repackaged PR, company announcements, company sourced interviews, mundane financial information - Or to take arms against a sea of promotion and say, Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion [[WP:PROMO]]. Alas, to be lacking in GNG and CORPDEPTH is the true state of each version. [[User:Steve Quinn|Steve Quinn]] ([[User talk:Steve Quinn|talk]]) 06:39, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' -- If this article does get deleted then I also suggest putting up [[Voonik]] for deletion as it has the same "sea of promotion" in it. '''[[user:Vivek7de|<font color="blue">vivek7de</font>]]'''[[user talk:Vivek7de|<font color="green">--tAlK</font>]] 19:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
| |||