Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limeroad.com: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:45, 16 October 2016

Revision as of 14:15, 17 October 2016

Line 34:

*'''Comment''' -- If this article does get deleted then I also suggest putting up [[Voonik]] for deletion as it has the same "sea of promotion" in it. '''[[user:Vivek7de|<font color="blue">vivek7de</font>]]'''[[user talk:Vivek7de|<font color="green">--tAlK</font>]] 19:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

**Looks pretty promotional, do a [[WP:BEFORE]] and if you can't find stuff that convinces you then by all means put it up for deletion, you don't have to wait on this AFD - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 19:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' I'm not really convinced that it meets NCORP and add to that the promo pressure, I go with a delete. The sources are also not very convincing. For example, [http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/fashion-curation-apps-like-limeroad-withme-voonik-are-carving-a-business-out-of-recommending-what-to-wear/articleshow/52352645.cms ET] has a very brief coverage (~150 words) out of which 100 words are quotes by the founder and investor. [http://www.hindustantimes.com/business/limeroad-to-redemption-why-e-com-troubles-make-suchi-mukherjee-happy/story-sAUju0EJoWSvhCif0JAnuN.html HT] is an interview of the founder which is not useful per [[WP:CORPIND]]. [http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/indian-fashion-scrapbooking-site-limeroad-raises-30-million-dollar-series-c-115033100253_1.html Business Standard] is a vert brief coverage about funding. [http://www.livemint.com/Companies/mvuL9EUPb0SrAcpKbc8L4L/Fashion-etailer-Limeroad-enters-menswear-segment.html LiveMint] is probably the only source which is somewhat better but not enough. The company has been trying to promote itself but it doesn't seem to have received enough secondary attention.--[[User:Lemongirl942|Lemongirl942]] ([[User talk:Lemongirl942|talk]]) 14:15, 17 October 2016 (UTC)