Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 189.178.72.176 - "→Generated code?: " |
|||
Line 109:
::::I saw teeth and blood all over the floor!, please be more kind when discussing. When to include or not the target code, depends on how is it relevant to explain the semantics of the language. That should be the criterion to decide it's inclusion. I still not understand what is Vala, here says that it is a preprocessor, maybe something like the old [[ratfor]] (rational Fortran)?
::::That is not clear in the article, for that reason I think is better to write a new one as suggested below <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/189.178.72.176|189.178.72.176]] ([[User talk:189.178.72.176|talk]]) 04:48, 12 October 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
On the one hand, most languages compile down to either physical or VM machine code and C++ itself used to be a front end that was was translated into C, yet not many pages (any?) on Wikipedia display this translated form. On the other, "not having to write in GLib C" is a feature of Vala, hence maybe it is useful to show an example of the C code. In the end however the latter can simply be stated, and for consistency with other languages pages on Wikipedia, removing the generated code example seems like a good idea. [[User:Mjog|mjog]] ([[User talk:Mjog|talk]]) 03:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
==Mem mgmt?==
| |||