Revision as of 00:20, 24 October 2016 edit Unscintillating (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,833 edits →Limeroad.com: strike duplicate !vote ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:21, 24 October 2016 edit undo Unscintillating (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,833 edits m →Limeroad.com: fix term Next edit →
Line 9: :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies\|list of Companies-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple\|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple\|talk]]) 13:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)</small> <s>'''delete per nom'''</s> it's been cleaned up since the PROD, but the sourcing is still really bad and too much of it actually fails verification - [[User:David Gerard\|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard\|talk]]) 14:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC) :<small>[Duplicate !vote ~~deleted~~struck.  [[User:Unscintillating\|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating\|talk]]) 00:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC)]</small> *'''Keep''' Sadly the company does find mention in the newspapers such as [[The Economic Times]], [[Mint (newspaper)]] and [[Hindustan Times]] which makes it notable according to [[WP:CORP]] #[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/fashion-curation-apps-like-limeroad-withme-voonik-are-carving-a-business-out-of-recommending-what-to-wear/articleshow/52352645.cms Fashion curation apps like LimeRoad, WithMe, Voonik are carving a business out of recommending what to wear]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limeroad.com: Difference between revisions