Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Fact check: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:39, 8 September 2006

Revision as of 23:56, 8 September 2006

Line 5:

[[User:Fact check|Fact check]] is a new user who immediately began removing any text with a <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> attached. I find it remarkable that a new user would know to create a purpose specific name and from the get-go be enforcing a tiny part of policy without having a history here first. On the assumption that this was just a purpose specific account created by another user, I requested on his/her talk page that the user mention who they used to be/what their other ID is. The user has been cagey, asking why I need to know. Perhaps it's a completely innocent purpose driven account, but I'm beginning to wonder if it's possible that this user might be someone coming back as a new ID to sharpen a [[WP:POINT]] about verifiability. If a casual CU is possible, it would be nice to verify that this is not someone who is currently under censure. - [[User:Chairboy|C<small>HAIRBOY]]</small> ([[User_talk:Chairboy|☎]]) 23:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I've indentified the operator of the account, but as he's a user in good standing I'm not going to take any action. [[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]] 23:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

<!--Please do not remove the following tag until this case has been listed on RFCU. -->