Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Michael Snow (talk | contribs) longer statements, Q&As |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2:
All users interested in the position are invited to add brief candidate statements to this page. These should be no more than 250 words and outline your views on banning and how you feel the Arbitration Committee should handle disputes. Candidates who wish to make longer statements may create a page in their own user space for this purpose, which could also be used for candidates to respond to questions from the community.
==Raul654==
I'm a current member of the arbcom - I was elected in August to fill in one of the seats left by Eloquence/Uninvited Company. I think since the election in August, the speed at which the arbcom handles matters (the primary complaint against it) has increased dramatically, without compromising the fairness of the process. As I said during the previous election, I think I'm qualified because I'm emminently aware of what goes on on the english wikipedia; that I have good knowledge of the policies (I helped draft many of them), and I would like to continue to serve the community in this capacity. [[User:Raul654|→Raul654]] 21:11, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)
| |||