Wikipedia:Three revert rule enforcement: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:22, 15 November 2004

Revision as of 02:31, 15 November 2004

Line 105:

#Yes. '''if this applies to 3 reverts of one page'''(one revert should be enough anyway) also I think 2 users shown to be in collusion who together violate the rule ("hey, I reverted this page twice already, go revert it for me ok, lambchop? sure thing charleyhorse, whatevah you say") -- [[user:Pedant|Pedant]]

#:I don't appreciate your implication. [[User:Lambchop|Lambchop]] 02:22, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

#::You know that you are always the ring leader, Lambchop. Charley Horse just goes along with whatever you say. [[User:Func|<tt>func</tt>]][[User_talk:Func|<tt>(talk)</tt>]] 02:31, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

===No===