Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Raul654 (talk | contribs)
Raul654 (talk | contribs)
Raul654: rm extra
Line 81:
I think my record speaks for itself, although I'd be more than happy to answer any questions. Ask on my [[user talk:Raul654|talk page]]. [[User:Raul654|→Raul654]] 02:41, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
 
==Raul654==
I'm a long time Wikipedian and current member of the arbitration committee. I was elected in August to fill in one of the seats left by the departure of Eloquence and Uninvited Company. I think since the election in August, the speed at which the arbcom handles matters (the primary complaint against it) has increased dramatically, without compromising the fairness of the process.
 
As I said during the previous election, I think I'm qualified because I'm emminently aware of what goes on on the english wikipedia; that I have deep knowledge of the policies (I helped draft many of them); I've participated in the arbitration process both as participant ('prosector' - so to speak - in the case of now-banned user Platus Satire) and arbitor; and finally, because I would like to continue to serve the community in this capacity.
 
I think my record speaks for itself, although I'd be more than happy to answer any questions. Ask on my [[user talk:Raul654|talk page]]. [[User:Raul654|→Raul654]] 02:41, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
 
==sannse==