Revision as of 07:57, 10 September 2006 edit Opabinia regalis (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 16,306 edits →Good article nomination: thanks ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:37, 10 September 2006 edit undo Opabinia regalis (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 16,306 edits →Good article nomination: recent changes Next edit →
Line 12: : The PRPP statement belongs to ref #9, which appears in the immediately preceding sentence as well. I added a second note - do you think that looks redundant? I'll look for useful links tomorrow - there's lots of them but the signal-to-noise ratio is not so great. [[User:Opabinia regalis\|Opabinia regalis]] 07:57, 10 September 2006 (UTC) :: FYI, I added external links and references to the tools that were paperless, and cleaned up some of the web portal links. I did leave the direct external links to the relevant tools, but hopefully a bit more integrated. What do you think? [[User:Opabinia regalis\|Opabinia regalis]] 23:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Multiple sequence alignment: Difference between revisions