Content deleted Content added
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Dead link}} |
Guy Harris (talk | contribs) →System software: DOS/360 was also an option; the reference says "Most didn't run MVT", which doesn't necessarily mean "most ran MFT". A claim that "most ran MFT" would also need a source for them not running DOS. |
||
Line 22:
==System software==
It was possible to choose [[DOS/360]], [[OS/360 and successors#MFT|OS/360
Although 360/50 systems equipped with 1 MB or more<ref>{{cite conference|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_BGDRGWzVw4C&pg=PA33&lpg=PA33|title=Using SMF and TFLOW for Performance Enhancement|conference=Eighth Meeting of Computer Performance Evaluation Users Group (CPEUG)|author=J. M. Graves}}</ref> could and did run MVT<ref>{{cite mailing list|url=http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2015-May/006672.html|title=Re: 360/50 microcode listing|mailing-list=cctalk@classiccmp.org|date=May 7, 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www3.epa.gov/storet/pptfiles/manning.ppt|title=An overview of the history of development of the EPA STORET System, with some comments on future timelines and plans.|date=November 7, 2001|page=3|format=PPT}}</ref> one IBMer described this as "[getting] blood out of the turnip", and noted that "most didn't run MVT".<ref name="most-didnt-run-mvt"/>
| |||