Module talk:Iraqi insurgency detailed map/Archive 5: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) from Module talk:Iraqi insurgency detailed map) (bot
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) from Module talk:Iraqi insurgency detailed map) (bot
Line 110:
 
Its very important that towns captured by kurdish forces during Mosul offensive are marked as yellow. These areas will be highly disputed in the near future. Do not assume that kurdish forces are fighting "for" the Iraqi gov. [[User:Mozad655|Mozad655]] ([[User talk:Mozad655|talk]]) 21:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 
== Edits by user with 95.153.129.148 ==
 
Editor has made at least 3 very false and huge edits in the Kirkuk area with no legitimate source to back it up what so ever. User has changed the entire borderline at the Kirkuk area to black. Up to 20-30 villages. Time of edits: 18:55, 21 October 2016‎, 19:08, 21 October 2016‎ and 19:21, 21 October 2016‎. Feel free to undo all his edits. I have already reversed once today. Overall not a single village or town has been captured by ISIS today. There were terrorist attacks. This does not mean the entire town was captured. [[User:Mozad655|Mozad655]] ([[User talk:Mozad655|talk]]) 20:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 
== Kirkuk surroundings ==
 
Are the big gains of ISIS south of Kirkuk backed by reabile sources? If not mods should undo it again.
 
According to NRT all attacks of ISIS south of Kirkuk and in Dibis were repelled by Kurdish forces: http://www.nrttv.com/EN/Details.aspx?Jimare=10603
 
According to Rudaw no oilfield was taken by ISIS in Kirkuk and Dibis cleared from ISIS: http://rudaw.net/mobile/english/kurdistan/21102016 --[[User:JapanerRusse|JapanerRusse]] ([[User talk:JapanerRusse|talk]]) 01:25, 22 October 2016 (UTC)