Talk:Comparison of cryptographic hash functions: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:54, 15 January 2016

Revision as of 03:03, 29 November 2016

Line 40:

:{{Ping|Nerfer}} No, TEA is a cipher, not a hash function. Any block cipher can be adapted to be a hash function, but in the case of TEA, that produces a weak hash. The usage of TEA in Xbox was a made-up amateur hash, not a real one. -- [[user:intgr|intgr]]&nbsp;<small>[[user talk:intgr|[talk]]]</small> 06:47, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:3|one external link|3 external links}} on [[Comparison of cryptographic hash functions]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=752029353 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:

*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6aO95FVW7?url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100216055807/http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~cosicart/pdf/AB-9601/AB-9601.pdf to http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~cosicart/pdf/AB-9601/AB-9601.pdf

*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150111210116/http://labs.calyptix.com/haval.php to http://labs.calyptix.com/haval.php

*Corrected formatting/usage for http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~cosicart/pdf/AB-9601/AB-9601.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 03:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)