Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solodev: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m fmt |
|||
Line 8:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. – [[User:Joe Roe|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe|talk]])</small> 21:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. – [[User:Joe Roe|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe|talk]])</small> 21:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)</small>
* '''
* '''KEEP''': Mike here from CMS Critic, we've covered Solodev for a long time, they are not only a worldwide company with an established CMS, they also recently won an award from us based on our readers choice as Best Cloud CMS. While I understand Wikipedia's desire to reduce spammy pages, this simply isn't one of them. I'd be happy to discuss further if required. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—comment added by [[User:Cmscritic|Cmscritic]] ([[User talk:Cmscritic#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cmscritic|contribs]]) 23:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* '''KEEP''': I don't really see how notability is even an issue here. I'm in DevOps so I think I can speak to the notability of enterprise software. This company is a long term Amazon Web Services Partner and first web content management system built for AWS, they're an Inc. 5000 multi-million dollar software company, they're competing with WordPress, Sitecore, Sitefinity, and doing well according to their revenues in Inc. 5000. Much smaller web content management systems are on Wikipedia. I say Keep.<small class="autosigned">—comment added by [[User:Webdevops|Webdevops]] ([[User talk:Webdevops|talk]]) 00:13, 21 December 2016 (UTC)</small>
|