consilience: difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:54, 4 July 2023

Revision as of 01:46, 20 August 2023

Line 20:

#* {{quote-journal|en|author=W[illiam] Herschel|authorlink=William Herschel|title=Inaugural Address to the [[w:British Science Association|British Association for the Advancement of Science]], Held at Cambridge, June 1845|journal=The Civil Engineer and Architect’s Journal, Scientific and Railway Gazette|___location=London|publisher=R. Groombridge & Sons,{{nb...|5, Paternoster Row}}; [[w:John Weale|J[ohn] Weale]],{{nb...|59, High Holborn}}; New York, N.Y.: [[w:Wiley (publisher)|Wiley & Putnam]]; Paris: [[w:John Anthony Galignani|Galignani]]|month=June|year=1845|year_published=July 1845|volume=VIII|issue=94|page=204|pageurl=https://archive.org/details/civilengineerarc08lond/page/204/mode/1up|column=2|oclc=978113081|passage=The common pursuit of Truth is of itself a brotherhood. [...] Surely, were each of us to give utterance to all he feels, we should hear the Chemist, the Astronomer, the Physiologist, the Electrician, the Botanist, the Geologist, all with one accord, and each in the language of his own science, declaring not only the wonderful works of God disclosed in it, but the delight which their disclosure affords him, and the privilege he feels it to be to have aided in it. This is indeed a magnificent induction—a '''consilience''' there is no refusing.}}

#* {{quote-book|en|author=Edward O[sborne] Wilson|authorlink=E. O. Wilson|chapter=To What End?|chapterurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=fnUkBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT395|title=[[w:Consilience (book)|Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge]]|___location=New York, N.Y.|publisher=[[w:Alfred A. Knopf|Knopf]]|year=1998|isbn=978-0-679-45077-1|edition2=1st Vintage Books|location2=New York, N.Y.|publisher2={{w|Vintage Books}}|year2=April 1999|isbn2=978-0-679-76867-8|passage=For centuries '''consilience''' has been the mother's milk of the natural sciences. Now it is wholly accepted by the brain sciences and evolutionary biology, the disciplines best poised to serve in turn as bridges to the social sciences and humanities. {{...}} The central idea of the '''consilience''' world view is that all tangible phenomena, from the birth of stars to the workings of social institutions, are based on material processes that are ultimately reducible, however long and tortuous the sequences, to the law of physics.}}

#* {{quote-book|en|author=Edward Slingerland|author2=Mark Collard|chapter=Introduction: Creating Consilience: Toward a Second Wave|editors=Edward Slingerland and; Mark Collard|title=Creating Consilience: Integrating the Sciences and the Humanities|___location=Oxford|publisher={{w|Oxford University Press}}|year=2012|page=4|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=fGB-AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA4|isbn=978-0-19-979439-3|passage=[T]he call for '''consilience''', which requires extending interdisciplinarity across the sciences/humanities divide, has, for the most part, been met with indifference or outright hostility by the majority of humanists.}}

#* {{quote-book|en|author=Nicholas Aroney|chapter=Originalism and Explanatory Power: Text, Structure and the Interpretation of Constitutions|editors=Lisa Burton Crawford,; Patrick Emerton, and; Dale Smith|title=Law under a Democratic Constitution: Essays in Honour of {{w|Jeffrey Goldsworthy}}|___location=Oxford|publisher=Hart Publishing, {{w|Bloomsbury Publishing}}|year=2019|page=106|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=8B6QDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA106|isbn=978-1-50992-085-3|passage=The '''consilience''' of a theory – its coherent integration with other theories – is also a desirable attribute, for '''consilience''' between theories contributes to their explanatory power as a group. '''Consilience''' can occur when a relatively general theory provides a broad explanation of phenomena that coheres with more specific theories, or when a specific theory provides a particular explanation that coheres with the broader explanations of a more general theory.}}

====Derived terms====