Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Fact check: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:44, 12 September 2006

Revision as of 23:29, 14 September 2006

Line 1:

<noinclude>

<!--

If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.

-->

{| class="messagebox"

| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add </br><span style="font-size: 125%">'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''</span></br> to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser&action=edit&section=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Requests for checkuser]] (but will still appear here).

|}

<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">

<center>''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Request for checkuser]]. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it'''</font>.</center>

=== Fact check ===

* {{checkuser|Fact check}}

<!-- Do not edit the top two lines. Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line -->

* {{checkuser|Fact check}}

[[User:Fact check|Fact check]] is a new user who immediately began removing any text with a <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> attached. I find it remarkable that a new user would know to create a purpose specific name and from the get-go be enforcing a tiny part of policy without having a history here first. On the assumption that this was just a purpose specific account created by another user, I requested on his/her talk page that the user mention who they used to be/what their other ID is. The user has been cagey, asking why I need to know. Perhaps it's a completely innocent purpose driven account, but I'm beginning to wonder if it's possible that this user might be someone coming back as a new ID to sharpen a [[WP:POINT]] about verifiability. If a casual CU is possible, it would be nice to verify that this is not someone who is currently under censure. - [[User:Chairboy|C<small>HAIRBOY]]</small> ([[User_talk:Chairboy|☎]]) 23:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Line 16 ⟶ 24:

:Sorry, my bad. Did not realise the user had already been blocked for an inappropriate user name. [[User:Ansell/Esperanza|<span style="color:#0000FF;">Ans<span style="color:#009000;">e</span>ll</span>]] 05:44, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

<center>''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font></br>Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.</center></div>

</br>

</noinclude>