HTML email: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:09, 15 September 2006

Revision as of 13:06, 15 September 2006

Line 43:

* [http://mailformat.dan.info/body/html.html Dan's Mail Format Site]

* [http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Configuring Mail Clients to Send Plain ASCII Text] — Argues that HTML (and MIME in general) should never be used in mail

* [http://home.earthlink.net/~bobbau/email/avoiding-html/ Configuring Your E-mail Software to Avoid Sending HTML-formatted Messages]

* [http://momentum.insertdisc.com/archives/2004/09/17/html_email_still_evil_part_1.html HTML Email - Still Evil?]

* [http://birdhouse.org/etc/evilmail.html Why HTML in E-Mail is a Bad Idea] (written in the late 90s)

** [http://birdhouse.org/etc/html_mail_counter.html Rebuttal]

** [http://birdhouse.org/blog/2006/01/15/html-email-the-poll/ ] — January 2006 poll and comments on whether the original document is still relevant

* [http://momentum.insertdisc.com/archives/2004/09/17/html_email_still_evil_part_1.html HTML Email -— Still Evil?] (2004)

* [http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil_still.shtml HTML e-mail is STILL evil!!!]

* [http://www.evolt.org/article/HTML_Email_Isn_t_Rich/25/53732/ HTML Email Isn't Rich] (2003)

* [http://wwwdsv.lowendmacsu.comse/triasicjpalme/02ietf/1022pfmhtml-discussion.html TheDo Dyingwe Artreally ofwant Plainto Textsend Emailweb pages in e-mail?]