Content deleted Content added
→AfD candidate surely (or prompt rescue project): new section |
|||
Line 174:
: I deprodded because at first glance, there are references independent of Hewitt. Merge sounds like a good idea if these independent refs turn out to be bogus. Feel free to bring this to AfD if notability is a concern. But non-neutrality of the prose by itself is a cause for editing and balancing, not deletion, if the sources are there to improve it. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 22:19, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
::But what is written here is incoherent. I can't even figure out the point that is trying to be made here. There are a variety of theories in comp sci that describe non-determinism; none I know of are mentioned here. For example, the [[history monoid]] and the [[trace monoid]] explicitly describe non-determinism as the commuting portions of communicating systems. What the heck does the stuff here have to do with that, or, e.g. the [[calculus of communicating systems]] (CCS)? Or any of the text-book notions of reduction and [[confluence (computer science)]], which is how non-determinism is normally talked about? No one has re-rewritten or improved this article in 11 years, because no one can even figure out where to start, aside from deleting it entirely, and starting from scratch? Sorry to be so harsh, but I've read the text three times, and I can't quite figure out what it's trying to say. [[Special:Contributions/67.198.37.16|67.198.37.16]] ([[User talk:67.198.37.16|talk]]) 04:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
== AfD candidate surely (or prompt rescue project) ==
|