Content deleted Content added
→Proof: A much clearer understanding of the Identity proof. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
→Proof: A much clearer understanding of the inverse proof Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 11:
* Since the operation of H is the same as the operation of G, the operation is associative since G is a group.
* Since H is not empty there exists an element x in H. If we take a = x and b = x, then ab<sup>−1</sup> = xx<sup>−1</sup> = e, where e is the identity element. Therefore e is in H.
* Let x be an element
* Finally, let x and y be elements in H, then since y is in H it follows that y<sup>−1</sup> is in H. Hence x(y<sup>−1</sup>)<sup>−1</sup> = xy is in H and so H is closed under the operation.
|