Wikipedia talk:Advice to users using Tor: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:36, 25 March 2016

Revision as of 02:22, 23 January 2017

Line 64:

::: ''Your'' “current practice” is not undisputed (see [[:meta:User_talk:Ajraddatz#IPBE|here]]), and the policy is under discussion right now ([[Wikipedia talk: IP block exemption]]). --[[User:Babelfisch|Babelfisch]] ([[User talk:Babelfisch|talk]]) 19:03, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

::::Meta's practice for handing out IPBE is different from the way that en.wiki handles IPBE. It's no different to how each project has it's own policies regarding admin/'crat/OS/CU roles, deletion discussions, article notability, project maintenance, etc. Respectfully, I'm not too bothered by Reguyla's opinion of me. He doesn't seem to have a favorable opinion of any administrator, nor is he particularly kinds towards us when we have to block his sock accounts. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> [[User:Mike V|<b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b>]] • [[User_talk:Mike V|<b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b>]]</span> 21:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

== Academic paper about Wikipedia and Tor ==

The paper is

*{{Cite conference| publisher = College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University Philadelphia, PA, USA| conference = CSCW '17| pages = 12| last1 = Forte| first1 = Andrea| last2 = Andalibi| first2 = Nazanin| last3 = Greenstadt| first3 = Rachel| title = Privacy, anonymity, and perceived risk in open collaboration: a study of Tor users and Wikipedians| booktitle = Proceedings of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW). Portland, OR| date = 2017-03-25| url = http://andreaforte.net/ForteCSCW17-Anonymity.pdf}}

It was covered in ''[[WP:Signpost|The Signpost]]'' at [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2016-12-22/Recent_research]].

[[User:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 02:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)